A worthwhile mod, then??!!Originally Posted by Oszy
A worthwhile mod, then??!!Originally Posted by Oszy
if you want widerrr
you need dimmaaaa
lol
Originally Posted by teabagI agree that's the way forward fellas...but I can't afford em! :(Originally Posted by MAXIBOY
for free? yes it is, but not so visible on the side pics.Originally Posted by Ivor Williams
but not everyone like it, it is not a prob.
I always felt the front on the williams keeps the back in check - party due to the reduced width at the rear.Originally Posted by white16valver
By increasing the width at the back, i would think the back would be less inclined to stay in shape.
surely dosen't became worts, it is still drivenable like before, maybe even better. I still can won the sprint/slalom racesOriginally Posted by eternalife
I think that the shocks and the tyres are more important.
Also I had my previous car (a valver) lovered in the front and at the back, and after it drives like s..it!! and my oppinion is also that for the front, you do not need to put to hard shocks...
What differences have you noticed by increasing the rear width? does it understeer more? or oversteer more? back easier or harder to control?Originally Posted by Oszy
100% agree with your on the tyre/suspension comments
Hi!
actually I do not feel a big difference, it is still easy to make the car oversteare(with big braking, or with put your leg off from the throttle pedal at high rpm), but easy to controll it as well....so not a sudden thing
One of my friend try my car, and he saied that it has just the same handling as his 17poo!
regards,
Oszy
lower it slightly and buy wider tires