Having a flick through the old max poo haynes manual and t recons the 0-60m timke on an rsi is 9.4 and 7.4 on a williams
Surley this can't be right as i've recorded a 7ish sec 0-60 in mine
Having a flick through the old max poo haynes manual and t recons the 0-60m timke on an rsi is 9.4 and 7.4 on a williams
Surley this can't be right as i've recorded a 7ish sec 0-60 in mine
Isn`t your stripped to the nuts and modded m8? And was this 0-60 onthe speedo or timing equipment?
Chris
0-60 always looks stupidly quick on the speedo.....
Aye, tis on teh speedo, suppose if i do 0-65 on teh spoeedo i'm spot on.
mine is stripped, and its mildey performance modded, but its rtunning std power due to the fact its on 125k
0-65 in about 8 secs from the speedo, 65 on the clocks is about gps 60
On my second go of 2 on a g-tech i got 7.4 to 60 so that sounds right to me!!!
Valver 7.7 secs but then they do say 106 Gti's and VTS are better than the valver but from memory they get 8 and 7.7 secs according to them books!!!
You must have one fast Rsi to get 7 secs.
Will have a go with my g-tec.
Haven't got the vid uploaded, will upload it when i get home, will also try to get a couple of g-tech runs in in cov tonight
i doubt ur rsi does 60 in that time tbf. the book times are abt right id say as what is the point in producing them otherwise and if they were wrong people would moan, so to bring ur 60 time down 2.5 seconds? maybe u have but its a tall order for me
Also depends on the Renault testing setup...like the 106/vts thing. Same basic car but the Pug is tested with a couple of people in and a full tank (or something like that) but most mag tests the 106 came up with mid 7`s (7.4 I think) so maybe the book time for the RSi isn`t quite right
Chris
yeah book shows the vts at 7.4 or something and gti at 8.2 or there abouts, but pug did test with a extra person to try lower ins group