Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Jackson

  1. #1
    Subscribed Member summeh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Up my own arse
    Posts
    3,677

    Jackson

    Not Guilty !

  2. #2
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ipswich Suffolk
    Posts
    391
    obvouis that an american jury can never find a celeb guilty of anything - fukin useless!!!!

  3. #3
    Forum User Andy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Location: Williams Land Cars: Minty Williams 2 & Now 0171 - AV IT !
    Posts
    1,537
    hang on he probaly has not done anything wrong

    mother was a gold digger

  4. #4
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Obey the camel
    Posts
    1,017
    Quote Originally Posted by Northy 2
    hang on he probaly has not done anything wrong

    mother was a gold digger
    well said






    OWWWWWWWWWW

  5. #5
    Subscribed Member summeh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Up my own arse
    Posts
    3,677
    have to agree with northy2.

  6. #6
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ipswich Suffolk
    Posts
    391
    silly me - of course it's perfectly normal for a grown man to invite male children over for sleepovers - ply them with alchohol and leave porn around- what was I thinking?! and of course all the previous allegations were also a conspiricy against this poor misunderstood individual- just make sure if you're being abused by someone that a] he's not in a position of power and b] you have white, middleclass family to back up your allegations.

  7. #7
    Forum User Andy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Location: Williams Land Cars: Minty Williams 2 & Now 0171 - AV IT !
    Posts
    1,537
    hang on

    right i am not denying jacko is wierd jacko is not all there but i dont think he did anything wrong there was no proof

    if a mother has a child in there bed to sleep no problem
    would it have been different if it had been a women i think so

    if A man does it that starts all sort of problems (thats down the line and not just celebs)

    just because a kid slept on a bed does not mean he is interfearing with him
    he has been proven inocent it was all about money which he got with all the interviews ect :P

  8. #8
    It was a dodgy case that the Chandlers brought against him. The father hadn't seen Jordy Chandler for yonks. As soon as he found out he was mates with Jackson and that his mother was getting the star treatment he came back.

    Then he applied for planning permission to build an extension so that Jacko could sleep over. It got refused, so Jacko just carried on staying at the boy's mothers. The father took umbrage and called Hollywoods filthiest lawyer in. They got a confession out of Jordy, but only after his uncle (a dentist) had plied him with a nice cocktail of drugs.

    You telling me that after 2 dodgy allegations and the vendetta of one DA you still think Jacko's guilty? As northy 2 said, if it was a woman things would be a whole lot different.

  9. #9
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ipswich Suffolk
    Posts
    391
    as the old saying goes - no smoke without fire - and yes as a mother I am positive that it is not normal behavoir for a grown man to have sleepovers with children [by the way notice it is only ever male children - ]
    Are you going to tell me that if he had been a truck driver/postman/ordinary joe bloggs he would still have been found innocent - and are you honestly saying that all these children making the allegations [not just Jordy chandler or the avezios] are lying and able to sustain those lies through hours of stements to police and prosecution officials? Something smells - and it aint the roses!

  10. #10
    Forum User 2 live's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    out there somewhere
    Posts
    7,399
    whether hes guilty or not....with his reputation would you let your child sleep there??


    i know i wouldnt

    and theres only 1 reason anyone would in my book.....which is to get money at a future date, hopefully an out of court settlement......unfortunately i think jacko had had enough of those n decided to settle the rumours .........one way or the other

    jus a shame it had to go to americans to try to make a decision lol


 

Similar Threads

  1. Michael Jackson Exhibit 'A'
    By big hp in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 13-03-2005, 04:41
  2. Micheal Jackson Exhibit 'B'
    By KingStromba in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-03-2005, 15:59

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •