VIPERONE
30-12-2005, 20:10
http://clio-williams.net/Parties/Optimisation/mecanique/Admission_GrpA_2.jpg
http://clio-williams.net/Parties/Optimisation/mecanique/Admission_GrpA_1.jpg
translated:
It is the most effective solution by far. This admission was assembled in rally on the CLIO 16S and Williams groups A. It consists of a news limps with air exit of turbo R21 as well as a large scoop which comes to be placed in bay of parbrise. Indeed, the engineers from Renault sport proved that there existed, at this place, a stronger pressure and turbulences which accelerate the air in the conduit. Advantages: The perfs are improved in a clearer way. Disadvantages: Except the cost of the system much higher than the dynamic or direct admission, the principal difficulty is at the level of the installation of this one. Indeed the apron should be cut out, to move the battery in the trunk or in limps with left water, to move the bottle of brake, etc... This system thus remains held with the experienced mechanics and those which are in the search of a maximum optimization.
http://clio-williams.net/Parties/Optimisation/mecanique/Admission_GrpA_1.jpg
translated:
It is the most effective solution by far. This admission was assembled in rally on the CLIO 16S and Williams groups A. It consists of a news limps with air exit of turbo R21 as well as a large scoop which comes to be placed in bay of parbrise. Indeed, the engineers from Renault sport proved that there existed, at this place, a stronger pressure and turbulences which accelerate the air in the conduit. Advantages: The perfs are improved in a clearer way. Disadvantages: Except the cost of the system much higher than the dynamic or direct admission, the principal difficulty is at the level of the installation of this one. Indeed the apron should be cut out, to move the battery in the trunk or in limps with left water, to move the bottle of brake, etc... This system thus remains held with the experienced mechanics and those which are in the search of a maximum optimization.