PDA

View Full Version : Jackson



summeh
13-06-2005, 22:18
Not Guilty !

snakeylady
13-06-2005, 22:24
obvouis that an american jury can never find a celeb guilty of anything - fukin useless!!!!

Andy
13-06-2005, 22:40
hang on he probaly has not done anything wrong

mother was a gold digger

Slithers
13-06-2005, 22:48
hang on he probaly has not done anything wrong

mother was a gold digger

well said






OWWWWWWWWWW

summeh
13-06-2005, 22:50
have to agree with northy2.

snakeylady
14-06-2005, 08:18
silly me - of course it's perfectly normal for a grown man to invite male children over for sleepovers - ply them with alchohol and leave porn around- what was I thinking?! and of course all the previous allegations were also a conspiricy against this poor misunderstood individual- just make sure if you're being abused by someone that a] he's not in a position of power and b] you have white, middleclass family to back up your allegations. :twisted: :twisted:

Andy
14-06-2005, 10:04
hang on

right i am not denying jacko is wierd jacko is not all there but i dont think he did anything wrong there was no proof

if a mother has a child in there bed to sleep no problem
would it have been different if it had been a women i think so

if A man does it that starts all sort of problems (thats down the line and not just celebs)

just because a kid slept on a bed does not mean he is interfearing with him
he has been proven inocent it was all about money which he got with all the interviews ect :P

Swervin_Mervin
14-06-2005, 11:04
It was a dodgy case that the Chandlers brought against him. The father hadn't seen Jordy Chandler for yonks. As soon as he found out he was mates with Jackson and that his mother was getting the star treatment he came back.

Then he applied for planning permission to build an extension so that Jacko could sleep over. It got refused, so Jacko just carried on staying at the boy's mothers. The father took umbrage and called Hollywoods filthiest lawyer in. They got a confession out of Jordy, but only after his uncle (a dentist) had plied him with a nice cocktail of drugs.

You telling me that after 2 dodgy allegations and the vendetta of one DA you still think Jacko's guilty? As northy 2 said, if it was a woman things would be a whole lot different.

snakeylady
14-06-2005, 11:55
as the old saying goes - no smoke without fire - and yes as a mother I am positive that it is not normal behavoir for a grown man to have sleepovers with children [by the way notice it is only ever male children - ]
Are you going to tell me that if he had been a truck driver/postman/ordinary joe bloggs he would still have been found innocent - and are you honestly saying that all these children making the allegations [not just Jordy chandler or the avezios] are lying and able to sustain those lies through hours of stements to police and prosecution officials? Something smells - and it aint the roses!

2 live
14-06-2005, 11:57
whether hes guilty or not....with his reputation would you let your child sleep there??


i know i wouldnt

and theres only 1 reason anyone would in my book.....which is to get money at a future date, hopefully an out of court settlement......unfortunately i think jacko had had enough of those n decided to settle the rumours .........one way or the other

jus a shame it had to go to americans to try to make a decision lol

KingStromba
14-06-2005, 12:18
Who cares abut his private life?

Billy Jean

One of the best songs ever made.

Swervin_Mervin
14-06-2005, 12:18
as the old saying goes - no smoke without fire - and yes as a mother I am positive that it is not normal behavoir for a grown man to have sleepovers with children [by the way notice it is only ever male children - ]
Are you going to tell me that if he had been a truck driver/postman/ordinary joe bloggs he would still have been found innocent - and are you honestly saying that all these children making the allegations [not just Jordy chandler or the avezios] are lying and able to sustain those lies through hours of stements to police and prosecution officials? Something smells - and it aint the roses!

Money. Simple as. As 2live says, with his rep, justified or not, you wouldn't send your kids round would you?

No one says it normal behaviour either, but when you look at Jacko's upbringing and childhood it explains why he's such a fvck up now doesn't it?

Those families besides the Chandlers and Arvezios were also making shitloads of cash in the years between the Chandler and Arvezio cases, by doing TV interviews with their claims.

The whole thing just smacks of people trying to make money out of a guy that is notoriously shit at handling money and generally doing the sensible thing.

Andy
14-06-2005, 12:27
he left him self open to it all im saying is i dont think he interfears with them it is not like they are on a bunk bed together is it his bed is probaly the size of my house

as 2 lives says in britain you would not send your kids i would not (might send 2 lives though :o )

but in america different ball game he is a kid who never grow up

kj16v
15-06-2005, 13:12
I agree with what one of the jurors said: he's probably committed some crime but not this particular one that has come to trial.

I think it's a bit strange that he was found innocent of everything, even giving alcohol to kids.

IMO American justice has allowed another rich white man to walk away scott free :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

J o n
15-06-2005, 15:24
i think the verdict was correct from all the evidence I have been able to see anyway. I think he's just naive and the press and unscrupulous individuals have preyed on this factor... I mean look how many people he's employed over the years and how many have stolen from him and made allegations up to extort money out of him? there's no denying he's a weird, but I think it's all innocent and he's a genuine person. nothing I have seen or heard to make me feel otherwise anyway. if anything I feel sorry for him.

ps, the giving of alcohol was BS, the kids used to steal all kinds of shit from him and run wild in the house... his only crime seems to be letting people take him for a mug

Slithers
15-06-2005, 20:23
i think the verdict was correct from all the evidence I have been able to see anyway. I think he's just naive and the press and unscrupulous individuals have preyed on this factor... I mean look how many people he's employed over the years and how many have stolen from him and made allegations up to extort money out of him? there's no denying he's a weird, but I think it's all innocent and he's a genuine person. nothing I have seen or heard to make me feel otherwise anyway. if anything I feel sorry for him.

ps, the giving of alcohol was BS, the kids used to steal all kinds of shit from him and run wild in the house... his only crime seems to be letting people take him for a mug

well said

KingStromba
15-06-2005, 20:25
i think the verdict was correct from all the evidence I have been able to see anyway. I think he's just naive and the press and unscrupulous individuals have preyed on this factor... I mean look how many people he's employed over the years and how many have stolen from him and made allegations up to extort money out of him? there's no denying he's a weird, but I think it's all innocent and he's a genuine person. nothing I have seen or heard to make me feel otherwise anyway. if anything I feel sorry for him.

ps, the giving of alcohol was BS, the kids used to steal all kinds of shit from him and run wild in the house... his only crime seems to be letting people take him for a mug

Yeah i agree also. The press and laywers are to blame

Smokey McPot
15-06-2005, 21:39
blatently touched up little boys.

but not in any malicious manner.