Valver vs RSI

[Andyvalver]

Alot of fast cars cant go full throttle on long bends, you apply 100% power on the exits

[Lunner]

Alot of fast cars cant go full throttle on long bends, you apply 100% power on the exits

Yeah by whihc point the RSi is already ahead.

This is comparing an RSi to a valver, they are the only cars lacking low down torque, williams' don't have that problem

As i said, i'll see you on track at FCS, or the next club track day, and we'll sort it once and for all on the black stuff

[Zollo]

I really do believe that your car would be faster around a track with a standard F7P engine fitted, Lunner.

It's worth trying one anyway :P

[Lunner]

You buy me a std valver engine, ECU etc and i'll fit it and see what happens

[Zollo]

Last item on that list....

http://www.williamsclio.co.uk/forum/...pic.php?t=7691

I can't imagine Jonny wants much for it, and a headgasket change is nothing when it's already out of the car. No excuses

[Lunner]

Excuse one:
Still need the ECU, loom, PAS pump, downpipe, manifold etc

Excuse two:
Its ALOT of effort to go through to prove a point, who woudl wanna put a SLOWER engine in their car

Excuse three:
I'd rather spend my time and effort putting a 2.0 in there :D

[Andyvalver]

Alot of fast cars cant go full throttle on long bends, you apply 100% power on the exits

Yeah by whihc point the RSi is already ahead.

You saying an rsi goes round corners quicker?

p.s. Im only messin mate btw :P

[Lunner]

You think i'm serious too?

MINE goes round corners faster

Was cornering at the same speed as the nana, and thats on coilovers iirc

[Andyvalver]

Do you know what torque an rsi and valver have?

[Lunner]

I know what torque my RSi has....

104.2 at 4787 rpm

BHP.....

110.0 at 5968 rpm

Car was VERY hot that day, and air cooling fans were poor to say the least, and the exhaust was blowing