Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 71 to 78 of 78

Thread: Manifolds

  1. #71
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    * B A N N E D *
    Posts
    7,104
    Not devil and stainless steel

  2. #72
    Orbisoud??????

  3. #73
    Forum User Zollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    4,906
    Slightly off topic here. Unless I'm missing something, it's obvious why the Williams system has a smaller bore than the valver one. I was under the impression the Valver is a higher revving engine, producing power higher up, and the Williams is a low-rev unit which produces far more torque at far lower revs. Smaller bore manilfold helps with more torque. Bigger bore manifold produces more top end.

    If you're chasing quarter mile times and outright performance, then a Valver manifold may be great. If you're running a tuned engine, of course the extra bore size will give better results.

    However, I can't imagine it makes more power low down as well. And on a STANDARD Williams, I can't imagine it will work as well either. If that is the case, then it will become one of the mysteries of the world as to why Renault decided to design a more restrictive manifold for their flagship homologation hot hatch. Particularly after they'd already made the perfect one already.

    Preparing to be shot down in flames :P

    P.S. Totally agree with Purplesun. Exhaust design is a black art and dependant on all sorts of engine parameters. And a bigger bore doesn't always mean better.

  4. #74
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    * B A N N E D *
    Posts
    7,104
    Quote Originally Posted by Zollo
    Slightly off topic here. Unless I'm missing something, it's obvious why the Williams system has a smaller bore than the valver one. I was under the impression the Valver is a higher revving engine, producing power higher up, and the Williams is a low-rev unit which produces far more torque at far lower revs. Smaller bore manilfold helps with more torque. Bigger bore manifold produces more top end.

    If you're chasing quarter mile times and outright performance, then a Valver manifold may be great. If you're running a tuned engine, of course the extra bore size will give better results.

    However, I can't imagine it makes more power low down as well. And on a STANDARD Williams, I can't imagine it will work as well either. If that is the case, then it will become one of the mysteries of the world as to why Renault decided to design a more restrictive manifold for their flagship homologation hot hatch. Particularly after they'd already made the perfect one already.

    Preparing to be shot down in flames :P

    P.S. Totally agree with Purplesun. Exhaust design is a black art and dependant on all sorts of engine parameters. And a bigger bore doesn't always mean better.

    I agree mate. Renault would have almost certainly tried the valver manifold on the Williams, but decided to go to the expense of making a brand new item. When you consider than they werent shy about 'borrowing' parts for the Williams from other Renault cars, i see this as evidence that Renault think the 4-1 is a better design for the F7R, and the valver manifold had some key disadvantages.

  5. #75
    Quote Originally Posted by Zollo
    Slightly off topic here. Unless I'm missing something, it's obvious why the Williams system has a smaller bore than the valver one. I was under the impression the Valver is a higher revving engine, producing power higher up, and the Williams is a low-rev unit which produces far more torque at far lower revs. Smaller bore manilfold helps with more torque. Bigger bore manifold produces more top end.

    If you're chasing quarter mile times and outright performance, then a Valver manifold may be great. If you're running a tuned engine, of course the extra bore size will give better results.

    However, I can't imagine it makes more power low down as well. And on a STANDARD Williams, I can't imagine it will work as well either. If that is the case, then it will become one of the mysteries of the world as to why Renault decided to design a more restrictive manifold for their flagship homologation hot hatch. Particularly after they'd already made the perfect one already.

    Preparing to be shot down in flames :P

    P.S. Totally agree with Purplesun. Exhaust design is a black art and dependant on all sorts of engine parameters. And a bigger bore doesn't always mean better.
    I'll let you know mate, my Valver manifold is going on today, if it's no better or worse it's coming off, is its better it's staying

  6. #76
    Founder northy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Williams Land Cars:
    Posts
    15,204
    thats the best way rob.....

    if you havent tried it for yourself you will never know.

    good luck mate.....and make sure u plant your foot in all gears

  7. #77
    Quote Originally Posted by northy
    good luck mate.....and make sure u plant your foot in all gears
    Will do

  8. #78
    Founder northy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Williams Land Cars:
    Posts
    15,204
    but not on motorways


 

Similar Threads

  1. Manifolds
    By spryboy1974 in forum Performance/ECU Tuning
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-01-2008, 23:08
  2. manifolds
    By rob-legend in forum Performance/ECU Tuning
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 04-10-2007, 07:36
  3. Manifolds
    By Ingram11 in forum Performance/ECU Tuning
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 05-04-2007, 11:32
  4. manifolds
    By dannyb1986 in forum Mechanical
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-04-2006, 08:05
  5. Manifolds
    By KingStromba in forum Mechanical
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 13-05-2005, 00:54

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •