Williams vs Megan engine build

[J o n]

We've just done 185 on a megane engine with nothing but cams and Omex. That's still using a valver ex manifold too.

Please post the dyno results.

lol, here we go...

post your rally car ones too while your at it, you said it was 175bhp... I want proof

No, i qualified my statement by saying it was around 170-175 bhp. I also stated that it was a guess. Plus i dont make engines for a living and so have nothing to gain by lying.

If someone claims to be able to get 185 from a megane engine with just cams and omex, then prove to us all you can. Especially as that person is in the business of selling products to WC member.

If you cant i will go around claiming 195 bhp from the same modifications and claim to be able to extract more bhp than GDI.

Dont bopther posting rolling road results, they are as accurate as a drunken piss in a rugby coach.

You dont make engines full stop. A rolling road is more accurate than you saying you think your car is around 'x' bhp too ;) There's no way your valver is 170+bhp anyway, 137bhp as standard. Old tired valver engine will make about 125bhp tops, so 50bhp from breathing mods? A Superflow is more accurate than the plucked from thin air Barrington RR method I'd say, plus who has their car put in a dyno cell other than people that race competatively? Think you should perhaps try living in the real world little Bobby

[The King]

We've just done 185 on a megane engine with nothing but cams and Omex. That's still using a valver ex manifold too.

Please post the dyno results.

lol, here we go...

post your rally car ones too while your at it, you said it was 175bhp... I want proof

No, i qualified my statement by saying it was around 170-175 bhp. I also stated that it was a guess. Plus i dont make engines for a living and so have nothing to gain by lying.

If someone claims to be able to get 185 from a megane engine with just cams and omex, then prove to us all you can. Especially as that person is in the business of selling products to WC member.

If you cant i will go around claiming 195 bhp from the same modifications and claim to be able to extract more bhp than GDI.

Dont bopther posting rolling road results, they are as accurate as a drunken piss in a rugby coach.

A rolling road is more accurate than you saying you think your car is around 'x' bhp too

No it isnt.

[J o n]

Yes it is, your claiming near 50bhp from breathing mods on your valver, no chance from a 1.8 lol

Besides, being all about the science an RR similates as close to real world as it can, again, more accurate your hate filled conjecture based opinion ;)

[The King]

No

[J o n]

aww bless

well, in fairness saying less makes you appear less dumb. Congrats

[summeh]

what the **** is wrong with you two??? I want to bash your heads together ****ing girls...

[summeh]

anyway back on topic... dan can you post some graphs to satisfy Rob if you have them?

[The King]

what the f**k is wrong with you two??? I want to bash your bishops f***king T-girls...

[summeh]

[sideways danny]

It's on the Dyno PC and i'm off work for a week now. Jon, can you ask andy for the graph

CATcams 213s

Rolling roads (when they measure losses as ours does) are far more representative of how a car will actually perform than an engine dyno.