Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 56

Thread: 197 engine

  1. #21
    Forum User Matty86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    1,536
    they get higher results than mk2s generally

    it's not an F4A, its an F4R 830

  2. #22
    Forum User stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Carlise/Swansea
    Posts
    3,230
    They have more complex VVT (not lift), which allows incremental inlet opening over a range of crank angle, as opposed to just on/off actuation.

    Bottom end geometry is the same, bellhousing fixture is different.

    Different inlet and exhaust manifold.

    The power figure from the factory is questionable, as with the 172's and 182's...they dont make book figures as standard.

  3. #23
    J o n
    Guest
    one at GDI was stamped with F4A on the block which confused me... no idea then... lol

    they make 184-186bhp on Omex/GDI rollers btw. 182/172 make around 166-170bhp iirc

  4. #24
    Forum User Matty86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    1,536
    the bitching from the mk2 owners about the 197's power reminds me of the williams' comments about the mk2 :D

  5. #25
    J o n
    Guest
    dunno why, it's a better engine tbh, they should just deal with it lol

    the F7R and F4R aren't much different, the cam profile is wilder on the 172 which is where the extra power must come from... about the eqivalent of fitting some RN2002's and not even mapping the car.

  6. #26
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Ultimate Driving Machine.
    Posts
    6,323
    obviously renault have tryed to develope it more to gain the extra power, cant fault that, just the usual over estimating the power lol

    i dont personally think the 197's are shit, ive driven loads and could do back to back runs against my 182, but theres not enough there to make me jump from my 182 to a 197, much rather get the meg 230 r26 or r26r is had cash!

  7. #27
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Ultimate Driving Machine.
    Posts
    6,323
    btw i was highly disapointed to not see a turbo version clio, should of been clio 230 with lsd lol

  8. #28
    Forum User stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Carlise/Swansea
    Posts
    3,230
    Quote Originally Posted by TheJesus
    the F7R and F4R aren't much different, the cam profile is wilder on the 172 which is where the extra power must come from... about the eqivalent of fitting some RN2002's and not even mapping the car.
    Heads, cams, manifolds, ecu....

  9. #29
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    wales
    Posts
    6,306
    what you think of the ndo box richy

  10. #30
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Ultimate Driving Machine.
    Posts
    6,323
    tbh i didnt think it was particually bad at all, gear selection felt abit notchy on some i drove, maybe thats down to the feel with the cable selection, but that said not that bad, been over a year since ive driven a 197/225 now! these were all virtually new cars at the time.


 

Similar Threads

  1. Engine harness/Engine wiring loom
    By Tammboy in forum Mechanical
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-07-2008, 14:02
  2. bolts for supporting engine to engine stand
    By finlay in forum Mechanical
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 28-07-2007, 14:42
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 20-06-2007, 13:29
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-03-2007, 21:57
  5. Williams Engine swap for Valver engine!
    By Plattsy in forum Items for Sale
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 21-12-2005, 21:37

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •