Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 83
  1. #11
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    345
    My williams beat the vts by 0.3s down the qtr mile, would love to see a valver close to it.

  2. #12
    Forum User matt uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    derbyshire
    Posts
    997
    i know my 106 gti is quicker than my old williams to 100mph

    for a start i can hit it in 3rd gear in pug


    probably have to be in 5th with a williams :P

  3. #13
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South London Drives: Hybrid, 16v + Willy 2
    Posts
    732
    I have a willy engined valver and a 106 gti run around, the willy owns it in everyway possible
    And the gti would get raped a new arsehole once rolling...

  4. #14
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Ultimate Driving Machine.
    Posts
    6,323
    the only thing i miss about my saxo was it was silver and could easy look clean with little effort! unlike my williams!!!

    but if you have size 5 feet and like sitting in a stupid position and like to mix in with the other 20million there is, go ahead!

  5. #15
    Forum User Zollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    4,906
    Quote Originally Posted by richy
    but if you have size 5 feet and like sitting in a stupid position and like to mix in with the other 20million there is, go ahead!
    There's no more stupid a driving position than in a Mk1 Clio! But I definately agree with the foot-space issue in the Cit/Pug. Tis rediculous!

    Great cars though

  6. #16
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Ultimate Driving Machine.
    Posts
    6,323
    yeah the mk1 clios are not great! but at least u can adjust the height etc lol

  7. #17
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Gatwick, Surrey
    Posts
    31
    the psa 1.6 v williams debate again lol

    The 106's/saxo's are great little car's, I sold an 02 plate moonstone gti after buying a house and bought a williams. Before the moonstone I had a gold gti, so I know them fairly well after owning 2 over the past 5 years lol.

    Standard limit on them is 7250 (<2001) (7400 >2001), there is no way they will hit 100 in 3rd...thats just wishful thinking lol... they hit around 62-65 in second..depending on the year and around 87/90 in 3rd... You can hit 100 if the rev limit is set to 8k, but this is cam'd/itb'd territory...and you say yours is standard matt?!

    fast for a 1.6, run out of puff above 80 without breathing mods... itb'd they go well

    Handling is about about the same as the williams I would say... but thats comparing an 02 plate car with 4.5k on the clock to an N reg car with 100+k, not really a fair comparison huh?

    Agreed however, they are faster than a valver... williams has it though imo.

  8. #18
    The saxscroat and 106 was just a new nova

  9. #19
    Forum User matt uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    derbyshire
    Posts
    997
    so you think then mine is chipped?

    its an r reg and limits over 7.5k and the speedo is on about 97-100mph at limiter in 5th and 120-123 in 4th and 5th goes off clock at 140mph before limiter

    ive had a few valvers and NEVER one quicker than this 106 gti in a straight line from standstill

    my 160k mile williams was NOT as afaster either and from what i remember is may be close between the williams i sold DAZ alli remember about that car was forever changing gear and i COULDNT get away from my mates 106 gti which my 106 gti is quicker than his.

    the mods on my 106

    pipercross filter
    spare wheel removed
    decat pipe
    magnex rear
    limiter is at bout 7600rpm which i thought was standard

    i may be wrong on the williams side and maybe i just owned a couple of bad ones

    but i would bet anything on it pulling away from ANY valver with similar mods

    i would definatly have a £10 wager on a race with a standard williams... well at least the 2 i used to own anyway..

    im not the only one that thinks this looking on the search thread, i am VERY unbiased on car views as i have owned allsorts in past.

    i genuinely do think my 106 is as quick as a williams

  10. #20
    Forum User matt uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    derbyshire
    Posts
    997
    anyway **** it im not arsed lol


    my 106 is a runabout

    i have a 300bhp GTIR and went in a 475 bhp saph cossie earlier running 29psi!!! which was just STUPID quick, not quite as fast off mark as pulsar but **** me when the power was down(30mph + it was a rocket), makes the 106/williams look like kia prides


    when we argue about the speeds of are cars its so irrelivant because in the world of cars out there both the 106 gti's and the williams are an embarrassment to the real fast cars of this world


    the only word that shouldbe used to describe either is "nippy"



 

Similar Threads

  1. saxo vts
    By jamesy in forum Cars for sale
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28-07-2008, 15:39
  2. *Saxo VTR £1450ovno*
    By Andy P in forum Cars for sale
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 29-01-2007, 20:25
  3. My Saxo VTS
    By DevilDamo in forum Pictures
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-04-2006, 20:34
  4. 2 saxo VTS's in one day....
    By dannyt in forum Driving Experiences
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 30-10-2005, 11:38
  5. my saxo vts
    By skipp123 in forum Cars for sale
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-08-2005, 08:44

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •