i see, so the short motor is pretty much the same apart from being bigger so you can mount a 6speed gearbox to it?
any exotic coatings etc?
Printable View
i see, so the short motor is pretty much the same apart from being bigger so you can mount a 6speed gearbox to it?
any exotic coatings etc?
Prob becuase it's fiction?
what is?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie.
Saw some figures on CS and the RR figures are like that of the 172 and 182, i.e. well down on book. I think it was closer to 180 the actual results.
they are the most powerful of the 2.0 RS lumps, it's an F4A iirc and uses a more aggressive cam profile as well as variable valve lift? Dan will be able to confirm as he knows a lot more about them than me!
they starting to sound very complex :?
http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?t=420747
Take a look at this.
is that you?
Check out Sherlock Holmes! :wink:
I can't remember whom it was but just take a look and see if it updates. I do think they are alot like the 172/82's so if you are looking for a true figure prob circa 180bhp.
:)
there doesnt seem to be much response...