PDA

View Full Version : Hillpower Rolling road people



FlamingMonkey
14-02-2006, 16:51
Pleasse could everyone postyp from their data sheets the following info so I can put in into a spread sheet please
I want the following

Torque figures, Obs Power and Corrected Power at the following revs, its all detailed on your sheets, should take you no more that a minute to do

2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
7000
7500

Come on dont be shy :lol:

northy
14-02-2006, 16:58
i will get andy to do mine and his rob.

Swervin_Mervin
14-02-2006, 16:58
2500 76.5 38.87 36.42
3000 80.19 49.05 45.75
3500 87.20 62.55 58.15
4000 90.60 74.70 69.14
4500 91.28 84.90 78.18
5000 91.97 95.63 87.57
5500 93.21 107.2 97.61
6000 91.43 115.5 104.5
6100 90.10 116.0 104.6
6500 77.00 107.2 95.30
6900 58.44 88.82 76.68

FlamingMonkey
14-02-2006, 17:08
I take yours is

Torque / Obs / Corrected mike?

Swervin_Mervin
14-02-2006, 17:14
Yip. I put the peak power point in at 6100 and my sheet doesn't show it beyond 6900. :?

Maz
14-02-2006, 18:04
All my data is below .. had to take pics as I wasn't sure what you were asking for :oops: lol

Maz :D

Graph on Page 1

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a311/Maz1879/Graphonpage1.jpg

Data on page 1

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a311/Maz1879/Dataonpage1.jpg

Data on page 2

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a311/Maz1879/DataonPage2.jpg

Graph on page 3

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a311/Maz1879/Graphonpage3.jpg

northy
14-02-2006, 18:06
might be best to wait until nick gets the results to me rob.

i will send everyones over then.

big hp
14-02-2006, 19:51
My 3rd run showed massive dip in torque, first 2 were bang on. I'll dig it out and send it over. Doesn't look pretty.

FlamingMonkey
14-02-2006, 21:10
Cheers Maz just needed the data on pages 2 and 3 really 8)

FlamingMonkey
14-02-2006, 21:41
Come on need more figures

Got so far

Mine
Jay S
Chris
Maz
Swervins
Daves

I need the rest of fatboys figures and the rest of you who are not listed :P

FATBOY
14-02-2006, 21:43
ok mate will scan right now for ya!

FlamingMonkey
14-02-2006, 21:49
If you havent got access to a scanner people you can just do what Swervin did :D

Cheers

FATBOY
14-02-2006, 22:24
cheers monkey! by the way mate can you work out my at the wheels bhp and at the fly bhp for me?? and also this corrected stuff?? its all numbers to me and confusin me as hell!


http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y108/fatboy78/LastScan1.jpg

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y108/fatboy78/LastScan2.jpg

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y108/fatboy78/RRdayresults.jpg

Martin
14-02-2006, 22:39
http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/2007/hillpowerfigures5bf.jpg

Zollo
15-02-2006, 11:20
might be best to wait until nick gets the results to me rob.

i will send everyones over then.

I like the sound of that idea.

FlamingMonkey
15-02-2006, 11:28
Wouldn't hold my breath about Nick sending them over...lol

Martin
15-02-2006, 14:11
more graphs please Rob!! hehe

Maz
15-02-2006, 16:24
Cheers Maz just needed the data on pages 2 and 3 really 8)

No probs .. does this mean I will get to find out what its all about .. :oops: lol

Loads of people have tried to explain but I still don't get it ..

Maz :D

J o n
15-02-2006, 16:27
which bit are you unsure on? the only bit I dont get is all the weather dependent results... the result on the day is more important imo, i cant see that a car runs 148ATW then it would run 131ATW on a warmer day, that's a huge difference...

Maz
15-02-2006, 16:32
which bit are you unsure on? the only bit I dont get is all the weather dependent results... the result on the day is more important imo, i cant see that a car runs 148ATW then it would run 131ATW on a warmer day, that's a huge difference...

Not sure what any of it means tbh :oops: I thought if I have a 182 it's bhp is 182 .. this RR stuff has just totally messed my head up .. :roll:

Please forgive me for being dumb ..

Maz :D

Martin
15-02-2006, 16:37
lol The quoted figure of 182 bhp is what the engine produces at the flywheel....transalating this power to the rolling road/or road through the gearbox/driveshafts/wheels/tyres reduces this power. Usually by around 20% on a front wheel drive car..

smokey
15-02-2006, 16:38
which bit are you unsure on? the only bit I dont get is all the weather dependent results... the result on the day is more important imo, i cant see that a car runs 148ATW then it would run 131ATW on a warmer day, that's a huge difference...

Not sure what any of it means tbh :oops: I thought if I have a 182 it's bhp is 182 .. this RR stuff has just totally messed my head up .. :roll:

Please forgive me for being dumb ..

Maz :D

You are forgiven Maz............but only this once so dont go doing it again ok?? lol :wink:

Your 182 is not technically 182bhp its 182PS which iirc equates to 178bhp.
However there are very very few cars which run full power as standard so your probably talking about 170ish in standard guise
This is only an ATF (At the fly) figure and the important one is the ATW (at the wheels) figure
They take the ATF figure minus approx 20% for transmission losses etc which gives you your ATW figure.

Basically what your graph is saying is that your 182 is slow compared to Williams's :wink:

Maz
15-02-2006, 17:30
which bit are you unsure on? the only bit I dont get is all the weather dependent results... the result on the day is more important imo, i cant see that a car runs 148ATW then it would run 131ATW on a warmer day, that's a huge difference...

Not sure what any of it means tbh :oops: I thought if I have a 182 it's bhp is 182 .. this RR stuff has just totally messed my head up .. :roll:

Please forgive me for being dumb ..

Maz :D

You are forgiven Maz............but only this once so dont go doing it again ok?? lol :wink:

Your 182 is not technically 182bhp its 182PS which iirc equates to 178bhp.
However there are very very few cars which run full power as standard so your probably talking about 170ish in standard guise
This is only an ATF (At the fly) figure and the important one is the ATW (at the wheels) figure
They take the ATF figure minus approx 20% for transmission losses etc which gives you your ATW figure.

Basically what your graph is saying is that your 182 is slow compared to Williams's :wink:

Lmfao .. thanks for that Smokey .. with me driving my car is probably slower that a willy :wink:

Maz :D