PDA

View Full Version : Williams Test Drive



Swervin_Mervin
12-02-2006, 21:43
Mr Zollo kindly offered me a blast in his Willy 2 on saturday rather than standing around freezing watching other peoples' cars on the rollers. I've never driven one yet and he'd never tried a valver.

Well, well. It's not one bit like I was expecting. I was expecting it to handle similar to mine but better. It was, however, totally different. The ride seemed marginally softer and it didn't tramline were the first 2 things I noticed. This has made me wonder whether to try the proper 185/55 tyres size in the GSD2 as opposed to the 195/50 GSD3s I run.

Beyond that, the behaviour is still wildly different. It stays flatter in the corners, with much less roll, yet turn in is slightly less keen and damping a little better. The 2L lump is also far more tractable pulling clean through from low revs, without that bogging down the 1.8 suffers below 3.5krpm, before coming alive. My only criticism is that it certainly didn't sound as nice at the top end of the range.

Before commenting too much I let him try mine, and after commenting on how he couldn't heel and toe in mine (I knew it wasn't just me) he began to spot the obvious differences from the front end.

After a chat when we got back with GazTwo who's owned both, we're pretty sure that whilst the Williams probably is a better b-road car, the valver is still an all time great hot hatch in it's own right. The approach it takes is far different though. The reason it seems to pitch and roll more is, we think, down to the camber it runs.

They really do have quite pronounced camber levels, and I suppose that when cornering this is more likely to result in the car pitching over. It's less progressive in it's pitch than the williams, and once over it seems to love to grip. I guess it's because it's effectively pivoting over on to the flat of the outside tyre. It also has the 1mm narrower front ARB.

Would I have one or build a hybrid? Not sure. I want to try one on track now and see how it takes those corners in comparison. At the moment I love the pitching motion of the 16v followed by that sudden grip. It's a bit like getting used to the passive rear steer on the 306/Xsaras.

If I like the way it handles on track I might well be tempted to at least fit the wider track and different dampers, maybe with some 172 Cup springs. Not sure I'm that arsed by the 2L lump though.

Jamie.
12-02-2006, 21:54
ur HIM on f7?

v good review

Zollo
13-02-2006, 23:34
Yeah Jamie, that's him :wink:

Good review Mike! Glad you liked it and it wasn't a dissappointment. Will be very interesting to see how Adam's compares to yours, to work out if some of the differences were down to your particular valver, or if it really is variations between the Willy and Valver.

T'was a pity yours had a little issue and I couldn't push it more. Perhaps another comparison when it's in fine fettle...


And it'd definately help H&T'ing if you lowered the throttle pedal

Martin
13-02-2006, 23:38
I've never driven a valver or a stnd williams lol just inbetween....

Zollo
13-02-2006, 23:39
Perhaps we should have a WC car swap sesh' :shock:

McPikie
13-02-2006, 23:45
FCS seems a good as place as any :lol:

Martin
13-02-2006, 23:53
The only stnd williams I've driven was mine when I bought it and tbh I think it must have been very, very worn it staggered round corners like a saturday night drunk, inspired no confidence whatsoever. Although having seen a few other williams driven hard round the track they seem to be on a par with all the 'uprated' cars...might be tempted by a wide track conv when my finances are in order...

Swervin_Mervin
14-02-2006, 00:26
it staggered round corners like a saturday night drunk

PMSL!

That is something else that should be borne in mind really in my comparison. I suspect mine is still on the original suspension. :shock:

I also wonder how much difference the 195/50s make as I didn't expect the willy to feel softer. I reckon a fair bit is down to the fresh parts and those 185/55s. All this means that I basically am now planning a refurb of the old girl. All new shocks, springs and bushes, and a return to 185/55 for road use, sticking with the 195/50 for track as per Richy's idea.

I still can't get over how different it was from what I expected. I thought it'd be like a valver, only better. Not a different car entirely.

So, to do this year:

New suspension
Welding to scuttle panel
New heater matrix
Probably new gearbox.

I feel a dry bumming coming on at asome point

Zollo
14-02-2006, 00:36
Your Valver is a really nice example Mike, and I can see why you'd want to keep it and spend money making it even better. But remember, it's called Jinx for a reason! Perhaps now's the time to cut your loses and get a Williams? Worth considering at least?

Whichever you decide, though, will be the right decision 'cos they're both great drives 8)

J o n
14-02-2006, 09:33
Perhaps we should have a WC car swap sesh' :shock:

that's actually a pretty good idea, I dont mind letting people drive mine... think all the NW lot have driven it at some point... lol

I'd like to drive a semi or fully standard willy and valver though too... might make me go back to std exhaust though due to head splitting noise! hehe

Martin, deffo get a wide track mate, but I'd personally get new springs, struts, shockers etc from Reno and brand new. I think its hard to beat really as it offers great all round ability

2 live
14-02-2006, 09:36
bin a long time since i drove a std williams.




think mandys was last std 1 i drove, but that was only a little spin.

J o n
14-02-2006, 09:38
ahem, what about mine round Donny, that was completely stock... well, suspension anyway!

2 live
14-02-2006, 09:44
yeah.....but i meant completely std. lol


ur susp was std...minus the brakes lol. wouldve bin interesting to throw em both round at the same time or back to back....see how they compare

J o n
14-02-2006, 09:49
oh right... hehe

aye would be interesting to compare, but I think your's would leave mine round track with the AVO's...

Swervin_Mervin
14-02-2006, 15:48
Well I reckon we should all do somewhere like Elvington, or if Mr Zollo wants to do somewhere nearer is there anywhere that offers some tight sections but plenty of run off further darn sarf?

I have no qualms about anyone driving mine, and at somewhere like Elvington there's nothing but cones to hit.

Tommo
14-02-2006, 16:12
Think I'd be nicely surprised if I drove a std williams, mine is so uncompromising at times, rock hard suspension and loud as hell! It's going to be even more hard core when I get the Eagles next month!!

stew
14-02-2006, 16:14
I'm wantng wide track at some point, but wonder just how much difference it makes.

Also no point buying 60, 80, 100K (whatever) milage stuff IMO. Id like to do what martin did with the nana and put all new stuff on. Im sure it would give a much better feeling!

I'm sure this has been posted before (prob martin), but can someone post up all the reno part numbers necessary for wide track.

Swervin_Mervin
14-02-2006, 16:17
Isn't it in the guides section?

It's also on f7power. 8-[

GazTwo
14-02-2006, 16:33
This is from the invoice I have from when Martin did the wide track......

Part Number / Description / Quantity

R60 01 025 842 - N/STK 003566/003566/ x 1
R60 01 025 841 - N/STK ARM SUSP x 1
R60 01 025 814 - N/STK ANTI-ROLL BAR x 1
R77 00 785 788 - N/STK BUSH A/R BAR x 2
R82 00 078 548 - 10471 CLIP A/ROLL BAR x 2
R77 03 035 027 - N/STK NUT x 2
R77 03 002 116 - N/STK SCREW M8-2 x 4
R77 00 784 170 - N/STK BUSH A/R BAR x 2
R77 00 784 169 - N/STK CLIP A/R BAR x 2
R77 03 034 017 - N/STK NUT 8X125 x 2
R77 01 367 623 - N/STK DRIVE SHAFT RH x 1
R77 01 367 627 - N/STK DRIVE SHAFT LH x 1

J o n
14-02-2006, 16:46
I'm wantng wide track at some point, but wonder just how much difference it makes.

lots

stew
14-02-2006, 16:50
thanks gaz and jesus!

Swervin_Mervin
14-02-2006, 16:51
For B-roads, I'd say go for it.

richy
14-02-2006, 19:53
well ive decided on my valver im just going to renew the suspension but leave it std, although i love how the williams handles i want the valver to feel different and have its different charatistics, engine will be normal 1.8 16v revver, std but ne suspension(maybe uprated springs) as per williams i did, and better brakes

but yes 195/50 for track and cheapness!

Swervin_Mervin
15-02-2006, 11:11
Good work Richy. 8)